Showing posts with label analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label analysis. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Analysis: Audience profile

Now that I have had a sufficient number of responses from my survey, it is important for me to analyse the results and relate it to my magazine. 



The large majority (90%) of people who filed out my survey were in the 16-18 age range: this is useful to my magazine because my desired audience was of a younger demographic. However, the fact that 10% of the responses were in the 30+ age range suggests that my magazine could provide interest to older readers - perhaps those who are looking for nostalgia, or who are simply intrigued by the new music scene. 



My magazine will be directed towards both male and female reads, so the fact that the survey is fairly evenly split (60% male, 40% female) suggests that this is easily achievable. It is important that my magazine can appeal to both genders, so I will need to create a design/aesthetic that is widely approachable - this does not mean that I will be using "gender assigned" colours or stereotypical designs. 



When asked what genre my pitch was reminiscent of, nobody chose "Pop" or "Hip Hop". This is a really positive result for my magazine because it isn't associated with those genres at all. Instead, people chose "Indie" and "Alternative": strictly speaking, my magazine is one that focuses on alternative music, however I feel that indie is a fairly broad term when it comes to music outside of mainstream. Therefore, it is good that 66.7% of people decided that my magazine is "Indie" because I can now know confidently that my magazine has achieved its desired style. As well as this, 33% associated my magazine with "Alternative" - this is positive as my magazine is centred around alternative music (particularly shoegaze/dream pop). 



Before this survey, I planned to sell my magazine monthly - at a price of £8. After surveying my desired consumers, I received incredibly positive results: 60% said they would buy a magazine monthly, and 80% stated they would pay £4-£8. This really reflects how I want my magazine to be sold, and provides evidence that a monthly, £8 magazine would be suitable for my consumers.

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

Language register-read magazine articles

The writing style of a magazine will vary depending on genre and its target audience: a magazine that focuses on an older demographic would likely have more formality to it than a magazine that is targeted towards younger readers. In terms of genre, certain magazines may adopt jargon that is linked to the style of music they write about - therefore, it is important to consider the language I use when writing my articles. 





Tuesday, 17 January 2017

Analysis/Research: Publishing Institutions


Choosing an institution to publish my magazine is vital: a publisher often decides on how mainstream/niche a magazine will be. Here are a number of publishers that caught my eye - each for different reasons.

Niche




Nobrow Press is a publishing company/book shop that is based in the UK: they publish really cool, niche books - as well as an occasional "zine".


Simce I own a copy of the above book/zine, it is fair to say that the products made by Nobrow are incredibly high quality and seriously impressive - this constitutes to the pricing of them. If I were to publish my magazine with a company like Nobrow, the quality would be high, as well as the price. Therefore, my audience would most likely be reduced to one that is far more specific and niche. Personally, I want my magazine to reach a slightly more mainstream audience and so a company such as Nobrow wouldn't be the best choice.


Mainstream

Time Inc




Time Inc is an American publication company that also operates in the UK. It has published magazines like NME and Wallpaper, and would therefore be a good institution to be involved with for my magazine - especially for reaching out to a larger audience. Magazines like NME and Wallpaper may be mainstream, but they still market to a niche audience: this is similar to what I want for my magazine, and so Time Inc would be a likely choice. Despite being more mainstream, the quality is still there - without being too expensive! This is important because I want my magazine to be affordable, but good quality.



Bauer




Bauer is a European media group known for its music publications, the most well known being Mojo, Kerrang and Q. These magazines are all mainstream; they can be purchased in a variety of stores - ranging from newsagents to companies like WHSmith. If I wanted to reach a large audience, then Bauer would be appropriate because of its mass amount of popular publications. However, I'd like my magazine to be slightly less mainstream, and focus on more of a targeted audience. Magazines like Kerrang and Mojo tend to be lower in quality, which isn't something I want my magazine to associate with. 





Digital



After researching DIY magazine, I discovered that it had a digital publisher - London based Sonic Publishing. They help bring magazines (that are already in print) to a digital format. Therefore, I felt that it should be included on this list; having a digital version of my magazine would be useful, as it could immediately reach a huge number of people: thus broadening my audience, and providing an ease-of-access for consumers.

Conclusion


In conclusion, I have decided that a publication like Time Inc would be a good choice for my magazine, because it still targets a more alternative audience whilst remaining on a somewhat large scale. Even if the NME magazine is terrible, it still reaches an audience that isn't purely mainstream - through it's publisher - and so I feel my magazine would be well suited to a similar publisher. I would love to have Nobrow as my chosen publisher, however it is simply too niche and expensive - especially to my intended audience of young people.